[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [platform-releng-dev] perf_31x branch of org.eclipse.releng created for performance testing eclipse 3.1
|
It seems there was some confusion for the naming (and I was the source of
the confusion, mea culpa). My intent with naming the branch perf_31x was to
reflect the performance tests for the 3.1 maintenance stream. However this
is not necessary since the branch R3_1_maintenance is used for the 3.1
maintenance performance tests.
So perf_31 was a good name for the 3.1 reference tests. Can we revert to
this name to be consistent with perf_30 ?
Thanks (and sorry for the confusion),
Jerome
Sonia Dimitrov
<Sonia_Dimitrov@c
a.ibm.com> To
Sent by: platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
platform-releng-d cc
ev-bounces@eclips
e.org Subject
[platform-releng-dev] perf_31x
branch of org.eclipse.releng
09/12/2005 07:28 created for performance testing
PM eclipse 3.1
Please respond to
"Eclipse platform
release
engineering
list."
A branch perf_31x of the org.eclipse.releng project has been created to run
performance baseline tests on eclipse 3.1. The perf_31 branch tag created
earlier has been deleted. We discovered that we could no longer use the
R3_1_maintenance branch to build the test plug-ins as there are changes in
the JUnit correctness tests which no longer compile against 3.1
We will start using the perf_31x branch of org.eclipse.releng this week.
As you make changes to your performance tests in the HEAD stream, please
remember to backport any changes to this branch.
Thanks,
Sonia
----- Forwarded by Sonia Dimitrov/Ottawa/IBM on 09/12/2005 01:01 PM -----
Sonia
Dimitrov/Ottawa/IB
M
To
"Eclipse platform release engineering
09/06/2005 01:20 list."
PM <platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [platform-releng-dev] Request for
clarification on performance
branches namingLink
Jerome,
we have not started using this branch, however we can look into the
possibility of renaming it to perf_31x as you suggest. More to come....
Sonia
Jerome Lanneluc
<jerome_lanneluc@xxxxxxxxxx>
To
Sent by: platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
platform-releng-dev-bounces@ cc
eclipse.org
Subject
[platform-releng-dev] Request
09/06/2005 06:36 AM for clarification on performance
branches naming
Please respond to
"Eclipse platform release
engineering list."
After some investigation, I found out that branch perf_31 for
org.eclipse.releng was used to run the performance tests for the 3.1
maintenance stream.
Note that for the 3.0 maintenance stream, branch perf_301 was used and
branch perf_30 was the base to compare against.
This leads to 2 questions:
- which branch is used to build the base for 3.1 ?
- why was the name perf_31 chosen for the 3.1 maintenance stream ? (I agree
that perf_301 was not a good name - especially when we were at version
3.0.2 - but I would have preferred perf_31maintenance, or better perf_31x).
Thanks for clarifying this,
Jerome
_______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev
_______________________________________________
platform-releng-dev mailing list
platform-releng-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/platform-releng-dev