[papyrus-rt-dev] Plain UML states in RT state machines?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[papyrus-rt-dev] Plain UML states in RT state machines?

From: Christian Damus <give.a.damus@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 19:25:28 -0400
Delivered-to: papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/papyrus-rt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:papyrus-rt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev>, <mailto:papyrus-rt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/papyrus-rt-dev>, <mailto:papyrus-rt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi, Team,

We have two tests that assert the successful creation of plain UML states (not UML-RT states with the «RTState» stereotype) in regions in UML-RT state machines (with the «RTStateMachine» stereotype). Why? It seems to me contrary to the structural requirements of our state machines, and in fact I have a pending change that fails these two tests:

https://hudson.eclipse.org/papyrus-rt/view/Master%20(Oxygen)/job/Papyrus-RT-Gerrit-Tooling/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/

Thanks,

Christian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [papyrus-rt-dev] Plain UML states in RT state machines?
  - From: Peter Cigéhn

Prev by Date: Re: [papyrus-rt-dev] Fwd: [cross-project-issues-dev] Disk usage report for HIPP/JIPPs
Next by Date: Re: [papyrus-rt-dev] Fwd: [cross-project-issues-dev] Disk usage report for HIPP/JIPPs
Previous by thread: [papyrus-rt-dev] Fwd: [cross-project-issues-dev] Disk usage report for HIPP/JIPPs
Next by thread: Re: [papyrus-rt-dev] Plain UML states in RT state machines?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs