Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [papyrus-rt-dev] Updating terminology (Cont'd)

I just rebased it. I'll push it to Gerrit and hopefully it will work.


On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:50 AM SCHNEKENBURGER Remi 211865 <Remi.SCHNEKENBURGER@xxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Ernesto,

 

Thank you very much. Let me know if you have any question /feedback

 

Regards

Rémi

 

-------------------------------------------------------

 

Rémi SCHNEKENBURGER

+33 (0)1 69 08 48 48

CEA Saclay Nano-INNOV

Institut CARNOT CEA LIST

 

Description : PapyrusLogo_SmallFormatwww.eclipse.org/papyrus

 

De : papyrus-rt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:papyrus-rt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Ernesto Posse
Envoyé : mardi 26 juillet 2016 15:33
À : papyrus-rt developer discussions <papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Objet : Re: [papyrus-rt-dev] Updating terminology (Cont'd)

 

Hi Remi. I did see that failure and commented on Gerrit. The codegen build fails because it cannot find the UML-RT state machines profile. After a closer look, it looks like the issue is that that one has been renamed from UMLRealTimeStateMach to UMLRTStateMachines.

 

I'll get the gerrit and fix the references.

 

 

 

 

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:55 AM SCHNEKENBURGER Remi 211865 <Remi.SCHNEKENBURGER@xxxxxx> wrote:

Hi team,

 

I pushed a new version of the contribution that sounds OK for me, but not for some of the gerrit jobs, especially the  codegen one [1]. However, when I look to the compilation errors, it seems that it only comes from the fact that the profile plugin used for building the gerrit is not up-to-date.

 

So, I have again 2 choices:

-        Ignoring the gerrit from codegen, and pushing the gerrit. Then I could ensure that the main builds stay green. In this case, and if I cannot solve the issues fast, I could revert the commit and work locally again on it.

-        Ask for a local review from Ernesto or any other people involved in the codegen part to check if everything is fine, and then only commit.

 

 

What do you think? I am reluctant to override the -1 from a reviewer on gerrit, but I know in this case that we are in a deadlock :/

 

Regards,

Rémi

 

[1] https://hudson.eclipse.org/papyrus-rt/view/Gerrit/job/Papyrus-RT-Gerrit-master/567/

 

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------

 

Rémi SCHNEKENBURGER

+33 (0)1 69 08 48 48

CEA Saclay Nano-INNOV

Institut CARNOT CEA LIST

 

Description : PapyrusLogo_SmallFormatwww.eclipse.org/papyrus

 

_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev

_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev

PNG image

PNG image


Back to the top