Re: [papyrus-rt-dev] Layout of the git repository

[Andrew Eidsness <eclipse@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm not sure where this version of make.exe came from, and I don't know if we have a license to distribute it in this way.

I'll see if Tim can provide instructions on setting up to build on Windows.

In the meantime, you could work around this problem by deleting the call to make in the codegen/org.eclipse.papyrusrt.rts/pom.xml file -- the entire <build> section can be deleted (lines 16 to 54 inclusive).  This will avoid building the RTS library, which means you won't be able to build the generated code.  However, if you don't have make then you won't be able to do that anyhow.

-Andrew

On 15-06-10 09:25 AM, LETAVERNIER Camille wrote:

Hi,

 

About make.exe, it might actually be good to keep it. I couldn’t complete the Maven build for Codegen locally because I run on Windows and don’t have “make” at all. Since Maven builds should be standalone, if make is required, then it should be part of the repo.

 

However, this should indeed be an exception; not the rule.

 

Camille

 

De : papyrus-rt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:papyrus-rt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de SCHNEKENBURGER Remi 211865
Envoyé : mercredi 10 juin 2015 15:11
À : papyrus-rt developer discussions
Objet : [PROVENANCE INTERNET] Re: [papyrus-rt-dev] Layout of the git repository

 

Hi,

 

That was the only one I saw J

 

Regards,

Rémi

 

-------------------------------------------------------

 

Rémi SCHNEKENBURGER

+33 (0)1 69 08 48 48

CEA Saclay Nano-INNOV

Institut CARNOT CEA LIST

 

www.eclipse.org/papyrus

 

De : papyrus-rt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:papyrus-rt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Andrew Eidsness
Envoyé : mercredi 10 juin 2015 14:49
À : papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : Re: [papyrus-rt-dev] Layout of the git repository

 

I was surprised to learn that make.exe is in the repository, but I see it there now.  I think this got added as part of Tim's multi-platform change that I committed last night.  I'll take it out now.

Are there other binaries that you've noticed in the build?

-Andrew

On 15-06-10 08:40 AM, SCHNEKENBURGER Remi 211865 wrote:

Hi,

 

As you may have seen recently, I updated the structure on the git repository, but was not very happy with my own contribution on the codegen/runtime structure.

 

I agree that we should go for a better structure for the git, as the codegen and runtimes are tightly coupled. The proposal from Charles on discussion of the wiki seems a good one, that I would like to submit with few differences: the separation of the tests and the sources  as it is done currently on the server. (one folder for plugins, another one for tests)

 

I added a section to the talk area (https://wiki.eclipse.org/Talk:Papyrus-RT/Developer_Guide/Git_Repository)

 

 

I would like also that we avoid binaries in the git repo, to keep it as light as possible. The papyrus repo is  a very big one as we saved there some pdf or some other binary files there. The tools like ‘make.exe’ should be kept in a different manner (download area or reuse an existing one from somewhere else).

 

Regards,

Rémi

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------

 

Rémi SCHNEKENBURGER

+33 (0)1 69 08 48 48

CEA Saclay Nano-INNOV

Institut CARNOT CEA LIST

 

www.eclipse.org/papyrus

 

_______________________________________________

papyrus-rt-dev mailing list

papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev

 

_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev