Re: [osgi-users] Possible mistake in Feature spec?

[David Bosschaert <david.bosschaert@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mark,

Features can be complete which means that they provide all their dependencies, or they can be non-complete which means that they have requirements and imports that are not met by the feature itself. In the latter case the feature depends on another feature to provide these capabilities.

So I think the sentence is fine. The dependency is not a 'require-bundle' type dependency where another feature is required by id or name, its a declarative requirement-based dependency based on what the bundles, and possibly the feature itself declare as their requirements and which are not addressed by the features constituents.

Kind regards,

David

On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 18:07, Mark Raynsford via osgi-users <osgi-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 2022-05-13T06:57:54 +0200
Carsten Ziegeler <cziegeler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>
> thanks for reporting. I believe this is a left-over from an idea we
> discussed during the design phase but then discarded.
>
> I created https://github.com/osgi/osgi/issues/435 to track this

Ok. Thanks!

--
Mark Raynsford | https://www.io7m.com

_______________________________________________
osgi-users mailing list
osgi-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/osgi-users