[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [os-gov-dev] meeting notes from Feb 27 with decisions and action items
|
Hiho good people,
Thank you Kaylea for the exec summary, it's helpful.
And thanks to all for the pleasant and productive meeting.
As discussed, notes have been set read-only and added to the project's wiki at [1].
[1] https://gitlab.eclipse.org/groups/eclipse/os-gov/-/wikis/Meetings/2024-02-27
I'll follow up with my own action items during the week.
Have a happy start of the week, cheers!
—
Boris Baldassari
Open Source Consultant | Eclipse Foundation Europe GmbH
M:+33 648038289
> Le 27 févr. 2024 à 23:49, Kaylea Champion via os-gov-dev <os-gov-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Thank you all for a pleasant and productive meeting today -- and for those who couldn't join us, I hope we'll see you next time!
>
> The meeting notes are at:
> https://pad.castalia.camp/p/meetings-2024-02-ez70osk
>
> I've filtered out decisions and action items as follows (note: there is a 'read these' action item assigned to "group" -- that means everyone has at least one item they can do to contribute to the good of the cause before our next meeting :D). Also -- I've given decisions an id# so that we can keep specific tasks connected to the reasons we decided to do them.
>
> Decisions:
> [D1: Proceed with work] We decided to try to take a two pronged approach: continuing to make good faith efforts to secure the agreement of relevant parties about making use of efforts made under the previous IEEE umbrella AND reconstruct, convert, and resume our efforts.
> [D2: Decisionmaking processes] We agreed in principle to a lightweight and consensus oriented approach with some degree of reflexivity and feedback built in.
> [D3: Initial scope] We decided to carve out a subset of topics to make preliminary progress, with two selected:
> - trademarks, logos, etc.
> - community governance
> We were in general agreement about the value of emphasizing best practices and offering specific guidance, with one candidate paradigm being the decision tree.
> [D4: Re-build group, onboard, and outreach] We were in agreement that we need to continue to organize ourselves into groups, be transparent in our approaches, build up a core group of participants, and support engagement. Several people committed to engage with their networks as well as participate in some preliminary progress in order to support the re-building effort.
>
> Action Items:
> [Group] All participants are asked to read the Mozilla Archetypes Report[1] and the Standard for Public Code[2] to inform our next rounds of discussion. (D3)
> [Cat] Will inquire with IEEE SA and Steph Walli regarding ownership/licensing of prior effort (D1)
> [Boris] Will continue to push forward on nudging people to fill out the survey to grant rights over the past material (D1)
> [Boris] Will grant commit rights as needed; participants need to agree to the Eclipse Contributor Agreement (D4)
> [Boris] Will create a Matrix room for us under the Eclipse umbrella (D4)
> [Kaylea] Will draft candidate language for decisionmaking processes (D2)
> [Kaylea] Will send out minutes and poll for next meeting (3 weeks from now? We need a regular cadence!) (D4)
> [Evan] Will (re) draft trademark/logos materials (D3)
>
> [1] OS Archetypes: https://blog.mozilla.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/MZOTS_OS_Archetypes_report_ext_scr.pdf
> [2] Standard for public code: https://publiccode.net/standard-for-public-code/
>
> Please propose any changes to the above and/or be bold and fix the notes.
>
> Best,
> Kaylea
> _______________________________________________
> os-gov-dev mailing list
> os-gov-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://accounts.eclipse.org
