Re: [mylyn-dev] Use of [patch] in bugzilla

[Robert Elves <rob.elves@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes, this is an issue.  I've added it as an agenda item to Tuesday's 
meeting:

   http://wiki.eclipse.org/Mylyn_Meetings


-Rob


Frank Becker wrote:
> By the way, contributer can only change the summary if the bug is 
> assigned to them. If not you get the following error. 
>
> "You tried to change the Summary field from "Context / Copy to..." 
> action should allow to create new task to[patch] "Context / Copy 
> to..." action should allow to create new task , but only the assignee 
> or reporter of the bug, or a sufficiently empowered user may change 
> that field."
>
> regards
>
> Frank
>
>
> Am 22.11.2007 um 22:55 schrieb Eugene Kuleshov:
>
> > By the way Mik, I don't think we have a consistent policy about these 
> > [patch] tags. For example, I've noticed that Rob been removing them 
> > when resolving issues, but you - wasn't.
> > I think it is probably a good idea to leave [patch] tags there even 
> > for resolved tasks.
> >
> > Also, I am not sure if bug 196032 cover all common use cases. For 
> > example, allow to quickly search for pending patches or create query 
> > that will include all tasks that have pending patches.
> >
> > regards,
> > Eugene
> >
> >
> > Mik Kersten wrote:
> > > Good question. This is an informal policy that we decided on a call 
> > > in order to help us prioritize bugs with patches higher than others. 
> > > It is a work-around for the fact that we don’t have a fix for this yet:
> > >
> > > 196032: decoration for pending patches / needs review
> > >
> > > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=196032
> > >
> > > It can be added by either contributor or committer. If committers 
> > > continue employing it and finding it helpful, and we don’t get to 
> > > solving that bug in the near future, then we can add it to the 
> > > Contributor Reference.
> > >
> > > Mik
> > >
> > > *From:* mylyn-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > [mailto:mylyn-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Willian Mitsuda
> > > *Sent:* Thursday, November 22, 2007 11:56 AM
> > > *To:* Mylyn developer discussions
> > > *Subject:* [mylyn-dev] Use of [patch] in bugzilla
> > >
> > > Hi, sorry for spamming the list with this quick question, but I 
> > > noted recently you started to prefix some bugs with pending reviews 
> > > with "[patch]" in summary.
> > >
> > > Is that supposed to be made by me/contributor after submiting a 
> > > patch to signal you that a patch was posted, or is it just a 
> > > internal convention?
> > >
> > > I haven't found anything about that in contributor reference 
> > > (http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Mylyn_Contributor_Reference#Patches 
> > > <http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Mylyn_Contributor_Reference#Patches>).
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mylyn-dev mailing list
> > > mylyn-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mylyn-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-dev
> > >  
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mylyn-dev mailing list
> > mylyn-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mylyn-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-dev
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> mylyn-dev mailing list
> mylyn-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-dev
>   


--
Robert Elves
Mylyn Committer, http://eclipse.org/mylyn