[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [mylyn-dev] Use of [patch] in bugzilla
|
Yes, this is an issue. I've added it as an agenda item to Tuesday's
meeting:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Mylyn_Meetings
-Rob
Frank Becker wrote:
By the way, contributer can only change the summary if the bug is
assigned to them. If not you get the following error.
"You tried to change the Summary field from "Context / Copy to..."
action should allow to create new task to[patch] "Context / Copy
to..." action should allow to create new task , but only the assignee
or reporter of the bug, or a sufficiently empowered user may change
that field."
regards
Frank
Am 22.11.2007 um 22:55 schrieb Eugene Kuleshov:
By the way Mik, I don't think we have a consistent policy about these
[patch] tags. For example, I've noticed that Rob been removing them
when resolving issues, but you - wasn't.
I think it is probably a good idea to leave [patch] tags there even
for resolved tasks.
Also, I am not sure if bug 196032 cover all common use cases. For
example, allow to quickly search for pending patches or create query
that will include all tasks that have pending patches.
regards,
Eugene
Mik Kersten wrote:
Good question. This is an informal policy that we decided on a call
in order to help us prioritize bugs with patches higher than others.
It is a work-around for the fact that we don’t have a fix for this yet:
196032: decoration for pending patches / needs review
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=196032
It can be added by either contributor or committer. If committers
continue employing it and finding it helpful, and we don’t get to
solving that bug in the near future, then we can add it to the
Contributor Reference.
Mik
*From:* mylyn-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:mylyn-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Willian Mitsuda
*Sent:* Thursday, November 22, 2007 11:56 AM
*To:* Mylyn developer discussions
*Subject:* [mylyn-dev] Use of [patch] in bugzilla
Hi, sorry for spamming the list with this quick question, but I
noted recently you started to prefix some bugs with pending reviews
with "[patch]" in summary.
Is that supposed to be made by me/contributor after submiting a
patch to signal you that a patch was posted, or is it just a
internal convention?
I haven't found anything about that in contributor reference
(http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Mylyn_Contributor_Reference#Patches
<http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Mylyn_Contributor_Reference#Patches>).
Thanks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
mylyn-dev mailing list
mylyn-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mylyn-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-dev
_______________________________________________
mylyn-dev mailing list
mylyn-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mylyn-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
mylyn-dev mailing list
mylyn-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mylyn-dev
--
Robert Elves
Mylyn Committer, http://eclipse.org/mylyn