| [mdht-dev] core features |
| Dave We currently have to features within core - I believe the original breakdown was to support general UML editing (table editor) and the second feature supports terminology which was anticipated to support a broad range of constraint models org.eclipse.mdht and org.eclipse.mdht.uml the org.eclipse.mdht features includes the org.eclipse.mdht.uml Are we using any of the original term.core etc in fhir (i did not think so) does it make sense to deprecate org.eclipse.mdht and move the term to cda ? Thanks Sean the breakdown of plugins for org.eclipse.mdht.uml <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.emf.runtime" <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.transform.core" <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.uml.common" <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.uml.common.ui" <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.uml.edit" <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.uml.transform" <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.uml.transform.ui" <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.uml.ui" <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.uml.ui.navigator" <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.uml.ui.properties" <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.uml.validation" the breakdown of plugins for org.eclipse.mdht <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.uml.term.core" <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.uml.term.transform" <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.uml.term.ui" <plugin id="org.eclipse.mdht.uml.ui.ide" |
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature