Re: [technology-pmc] Incubation train status

[Jim Hughes <jnh5y@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi Rob, Eugene,

Thanks!  And yeah, the License of Good and Not Evil is wicked...;)  Anyhow, time to continue earning my keep...

Just so there's a record here are the CQs I see awaiting PMC approval:

Monocle: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11327
Spire-macros: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11351
Paranamer: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11330
Kryo-serializers: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11336
Log4j (Piggyback): https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11074
Jackson JSON Library: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11077 and https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11076
XZ (pb): https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11080
Spire: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11348
OpenCSV: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11329
httpcore: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11341
ASM (pb): https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11079
Scallop: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11346
NScala-time: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11328
Slick: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11331
Spray-Json: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11337
Commons-compress (pb): https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11075
Jdom (pb): https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11078
Commons-logging (pb): https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11335
Avro: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11338

I have approved the above.  They are a mix of piggyback CQs and standard libraries from either the Scala or big data communities. 

There are 4 CQs where I have brief questions or notes below.  If any of the suggestions don't work, I'm still in favor of approving the CQs as is.  Changing versions of dependencies can help reduce time for review though:)

** For Objenesis, note these GeoMesa CQs:
Failed 1.2 CQ: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8724
Approved 1.0 CQ: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10301

GeoTrellis Objenesis: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11345

Given that, GeoTrellis will either need to give 1.0 a spin or we'll need to ask Eclipse Legal to run down 1.2.

** For Joda convert, are you able to try out version 1.6?

GeoTrellis Joda Convert 1.2: 
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11342
Joda Convert 1.6:
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8432

** For Httpcore, can you try out 4.4?

GeoTrellis CQs:
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11341
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11340
Example Exisiting CQ for 4.4 (one of many):  https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10535

** For Commons-lang, I asked Sharon to make https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11339 a Piggyback CQ on https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9081.  If that doesn't pan out, you might need to close and re-open it.

Cheers,

Jim

On 05/20/2016 12:33 PM, Rob Emanuele wrote:

Hey Jim/all,

GeoTrellis is chugging along. We got a bunch of CQ's submitted for GeoTrellis, and only have a bit over 10 left according to our cod sprint thermometer (photo by Jody): https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ch4CnE8VEAE9HZw.jpg:large

There are a lot of CQ's in the queue that need PMC +1's, so feel free to lend a hand if you have the time :)

That CQ did time out; we would have had to withdraw it anyway, since the library that is for is unable to be accepted without modification; someone else had done modification to it to include some additional license information (who knew a license with "The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil." in it would cause so much pain?) So I will have to resubmit a modified version or piggyback off of a CQ with that work already done, if the versions match up.

I have some time set aside to work through CQ issues in the next couple of weeks, so you'll be hearing more out of me soon.

Thanks to Jim, rock start PMC member and Steering Committee rep, for keeping on top of this! It is really high value and much appreciated.

Cheers,

Rob

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jim Hughes <jnh5y@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all,

The code sprint after FOSS4G NA was a great event for entering CQs and working with Eclipse infrastructure; I wanted to check in and see if we can keep the momentum up.

If I recall, GeoTrellis and GeoGig are up next on the LT incubation train.  How's it going?

Gabriel, Tyler, is there anything we can be doing to help GeoGig along?

I got an email about this GeoTrellis CQ timing out: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 timing out, and I wanted to make sure that both Eclipse legal and our committers were engaged.

Cheers,

Jim
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc