Thanks Jim! I was thinking the same thing wrt JDBC connectors. We're currently tied to postgres for serious deployments, but the rest can probably be 'works with'.
On 7 May 2016 9:36 p.m., "Jim Hughes" <jnh5y@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Tyler,
Those CQs all make sense to me, and I vote +1. (I've also pushed
the +1 button.)
As a suggestion/note, if you don't ship the JDBC connectors, you
might be able to treat them as 'workswith' dependencies.
Cheers,
Jim
On 5/7/2016 7:07 PM, Tyler Battle
wrote:
We've got 10 CQs in need of PMC approval.
This link should list them (if they're still awaiting PMC):