Re: [technology-pmc] GeoGig CQs in need of PMC approval

[Jim Hughes <jnh5y@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi Tyler,

Those CQs all make sense to me, and I vote +1.  (I've also pushed the +1 button.)

As a suggestion/note, if you don't ship the JDBC connectors, you might be able to treat them as 'workswith' dependencies.

Cheers,

Jim

On 5/7/2016 7:07 PM, Tyler Battle wrote:

We've got 10 CQs in need of PMC approval.

This link should list them (if they're still awaiting PMC):

https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&product=locationtech&component=locationtech.technology.geogig&long_desc_type=substring&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&keywords_type=allwords&bug_severity=awaiting_pmc&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&bugidtype=include&chfieldto=Now&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time

-Tyler

_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc