[technology-pmc] dependency discussion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[technology-pmc] dependency discussion

From: Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 23:28:57 +1000
Delivered-to: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://locationtech.org/mhonarc/lists/technology-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:technology-pmc-request@locationtech.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@locationtech.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://locationtech.org/mailman/options/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@locationtech.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I am going to tone down the number of dependencies I send to the PMC for discussion. Going to stick with "exempt" and "works with", at least until we get through this initial rush.

Jody

Prev by Date: [technology-pmc] Fw: Jiffle language and String template
Next by Date: Re: [technology-pmc] PMC/PSC call to vote for Eclipse IP CQ Sphinx dependency
Previous by thread: [technology-pmc] Dependency discussion
Next by thread: [technology-pmc] geodb
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs