[technology-pmc] groovy 1.8.8 (CQ 7463)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[technology-pmc] groovy 1.8.8 (CQ 7463)

From: Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 11:26:18 +1000
Delivered-to: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://locationtech.org/mhonarc/lists/technology-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:technology-pmc-request@locationtech.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@locationtech.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://locationtech.org/mailman/options/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@locationtech.org?subject=unsubscribe>

So how do we feel about groovy as a dependency? It is a reasonable popular JVM language. I have submitted CQ7463 (which needs to be corrected to say version 1.8.8 - is there any way for me to edit a CQ description once it is created?)

This dependency is used by GeoScript as far as I know. The groovy project is still making use of antlr 2.x stream which may be a problem for us.

Jody Garnett

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [technology-pmc] groovy 1.8.8 (CQ 7463)
  - From: Jody Garnett

Prev by Date: Re: [technology-pmc] PMC/PSC call to vote for Eclipse IP CQ Sphinx dependency
Next by Date: [technology-pmc] Dependency discussion
Previous by thread: [technology-pmc] JAITools 1.3.0
Next by thread: Re: [technology-pmc] groovy 1.8.8 (CQ 7463)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs