[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [technology-pmc] jiffle 0.2.1
|
Is jiffle 0.2.1 usable without Antlr 2.7.7? I expect that the answer
is no.
no.
Please clarify? Is this a library that you intend to distribute with
the uDig code? (or is it a potential "works with" library?)
Right now I am submitting all the stuff we distribute with uDig 1.4.0. I am about 60% of the way through the list.
I am not the maintainer of the JGrass module which makes use of these facilities so I do not have the technical specifics, from my standpoint: For we distribute a binary jar (for runtime) and a source jar (to assist developers in debugging).
I recommend that you go ahead and create the CQ, but let the IP team
know that a new version is expected "soon".
I have added that comment, however before I can assign the CQ back to the IP team I need this email discussion :)
Indeed I am getting my cart before the horse, in that I need to link to an antlr 2.7.7 CQ so IPZilla gets the complete story.
They can do the
necessary checks to grant parallel IP check-in and then just wait
before engaging in the full IP review until the new version is
ready. When the new version is ready, you can ask the IP team to
just update the existing CQ for the new version.
Thanks for the tip.
This will save the IP team spending cycles on the 0.2.1 version.
With the Antlr 2.7.7 dependency, you won't be able to release
anyway.
My understanding is they may do a review, in order to just perform a "faster" review later.
Or have I missed something important?
I think you are on the money Wayne, I am just taking too long submitting everything.
Jody
