[Date Prev][
Date Next][Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[Technology-pmc] GeoTools 9.0-M0 dependency
|
The CQ process keeps busting me down waiting for PMC approval - which I understand is a discussion+vote on this list?
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|new |awaiting_pmc
In this case the uDig project would like to request a dependency on GeoTools 9.0 M0 (this is a milestone release tagged and formally deployed to a maven repository). I am aware of a number of issues with the source code (see the CQ), but this represents our current build target for uDig and we would like to complete our code base migration prior to consider any upgrade of dependencies.
It is noted that subsequent CQs for new versions of this dependency are expected by both the uDig project and GeoScript project.
FORWARD to 9.3
There is a relatively small number of changes between 9.0-M0 and the current 9.3 codebase I am releasing today.
However one of the changes is fixing 4 files mistakenly marked with a GPL header, and one file has had its licensed clarified as BSD.
For background please review the following email threads:
- http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Mind-your-head-td5061324.html
- http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Sosnoski-license-lt-gt-sos-no-kill-license-td5059331.html
Aside: I have 150 odd jars, and am happy to start an email conversation for each one here as needed :-)
--
Jody Garnett
