Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jpa-dev] What's next for JPA?

I am adding a few folks here that could help mentor and kick-start this. I myself frankly can only guess at this point. However, I would say all of this is new so starting just about anywhere is fine.

Additional responses below. I have removed extra text for brevity.

Reza Rahman
Principal Program Manager
Java on Azure

Please note views expressed here are my own as an individual community member and do not reflect the views of my employer.

On 11/2/2019 9:04 AM, Christian Beikov wrote:

I think there are lot's of issues in the issue tracker that could be tackled, but at this point I am not sure about how to start.

I suggest starting by triaging the issues here together.

Are the discussions about the big bang namespace change already over?

There is still some churn but looks like things are very, very slowly gravitating towards big bang. I believe the community stepping up to move things forward will accelerate these decisions.

Is it even possible to add features in such a seemingly "namespace-change-only" release?

Likely not.

What needs to be done to actually add a feature? Is a PR containing the spec and API changes enough? I guess a TCK test would have to be added as well? How is the decision made that a feature is added?

Anything that can be done is progress. In order for something to be considered complete, it likely needs an API change, change in one of the implementations, a TCK change and a spec document change. They don't all need to be done by the same people. The project committers and lead decides if a change will be made - effectively that means all of us together. Given the state of things, I would say most reasonable changes should make it in. It is contributing that actually matters.

It would be great if we could illustrate the process with a more or less simple issue(https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jpa-api/issues/163) so that people get a feeling for how the specification can be shaped.

As long as you have the paperwork set up, I would say there is nothing stopping you from doing exactly that.


Back to the top