Hi,
If the connector tests are failing due to connector_1_0.dtd [1] being less strict than connector_2_0.xsd [2] about the `connection-interface` type, should the TCK connector tests adjust for the stricter connector_2_0.xsd [2] requirement that `connection-interface` be of type "jakartaee:fully-qualified-classType"?
Does connector_2_0.xsd require the `connection-interface` class to be in the jakarta namespace?
The test failure is mentioned in jakartaee-tck/pull#474 [3] (see second paragraph in comment) and also in test result [4].
Connector 2.0 spec [5] shows that connection-interface could be at least one of { jakarta.resource.cci.Connection, jakarta.jms.QueueConnection, jakarta.jms.TopicConnection, jakarta.jms.Connection }.
So perhaps the connector TCK tests should update `com.sun.ts.tests.common.connector.whitebox.TSConnectionFactory` to be of type jakarta.resource.cci.Connection.
For reference [6] shows the pull/474 ([3]) connector/whitebox/ra-compat-tx.xml file that may need more changes.
Scott