[jakartaee-tck-dev] In TCK documentation, should tested platforms use mo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[jakartaee-tck-dev] In TCK documentation, should tested platforms use more generic OS descriptions...

From: Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:07:45 -0400
Delivered-to: jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/jakartaee-tck-dev>
List-help: <mailto:jakartaee-tck-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev>, <mailto:jakartaee-tck-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/jakartaee-tck-dev>, <mailto:jakartaee-tck-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

Does it still make sense to list the OS platforms that we have tested TCKs on?

If we should still include the OS platforms, could we just refer to Linux, instead of referring to the exact distribution and version?

Scott

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] In TCK documentation, should tested platforms use more generic OS descriptions...
  - From: Lance Andersen

Prev by Date: Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] [glassfish-dev] GlassFish status
Next by Date: Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] In TCK documentation, should tested platforms use more generic OS descriptions...
Previous by thread: Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] [glassfish-dev] GlassFish status
Next by thread: Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] In TCK documentation, should tested platforms use more generic OS descriptions...
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the top