Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] Jakarta Transaction signatures (maybe others)

As a reminder, all APIs need to be at the Java SE 8 source and binary levels.  The implementations need to support Java SE 11, but the APIs still need to be at the Java SE 8 level.  I'm not exactly clear on how these signature files get processed for the TCK, but when I see items proposed to be deleted related to Java SE 8 and APIs, it makes me nervous...  Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect @ IBM
e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)    
LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter



From:        Tom Jenkinson <tom.jenkinson@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:        Alwin Joseph <alwin.joseph@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:        jakartaee-tck developer discussions <jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:        06/10/2020 11:44
Subject:        [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] Jakarta Transaction signatures (maybe        others)
Sent by:        jakartaee-tck-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx




I whatever you provided as [1] was not included in your message?

But Glassfish master seems to be using 2.0.0-RC2: https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/glassfish/blob/master/appserver/pom.xml#L130. That version you can find in staging: https://jakarta.oss.sonatype.org/content/groups/staging/jakarta/transaction/jakarta.transaction-api/2.0.0-RC2/

On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 16:03, Alwin Joseph <alwin.joseph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Tom,
As of now we have generated new signature file to be run in JDK8 as jakarta.transaction.sig_2.0_se8(using [1],  Is this the same jar that is integrated to glassfish ?)
The sig tests currently pass in standalone mode, but fails in jsp & servlet vehicles, this needs to be investigated.

We will remove the javax.* and also update the jakarta.transaction.sig_1.2_se11 as jakarta.transaction.sig_2.0_se11 to be run in JDK11.

Regards,
Alwin

On 10/06/20 7:18 pm, Tom Jenkinson wrote:
Hi,

I am not very familiar with the requirements on signatures, but when I  look at https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakartaee-spec-project-leads/msg00413.htmland at https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/tree/master/src/com/sun/ts/tests/signaturetest/signature-repository, for Jakarta Transactions I am thinking:

1. We need to add a jakarta.transaction.sig_2.0_se11 (I am not sure what would go in there though)
2. The following should be removed:
   * jakarta.transaction.sig_1.2_se11
   * javax.transaction.sig_1.2_se8
   * javax.transaction.sig_1.3_se8

Thanks for your assistance,
Tom

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev




Back to the top