Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] Discussion on stand alone TCKs as part of the ce

[Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

It depends entirely on what "product" you're trying to certify.

If you have a Jakarta EE platform product, you'll need to certify with the Jakarta EE platform TCK.  Since several required TCKs are not integrated with the platform TCK, the platform TCK rules require you to separately test with some of these other TCKs (such as CDI and BV).

If you have a product that supports only the WebSocket API, you need to test with the WebSocket TCK.

If you have a product that supports the Jakarta EE platform and also allows you to use pieces of that product independently of the entire platform, you'll need to certify with the platform TCK and the TCKs for all pieces that are usable independently.

Does that make sense?

Scott Highbarger wrote on 6/25/19 11:51 AM:

Some of the recent discussions on stand alone TCKs got me to wondering what if any are we going to require as part of the Jakarta certification process? Is the jakartaeetck the only hard requirement and the stand alone TCKs additional for extra features/implementations? Many of the stand alone TCKs clearly have over lap with the jakartaeetck but specifically I've been thinking of this in the context of areas like the CDI 2.0 TCK and websocket 1.1 etc. which do not have as much over lap.
The CDI 2.0 was technically part of the EE8 Spec, while I believe the websocket 1.1 level was not. I'm wondering what the rest of the community is thinking in regards to these stand alone TCKs that don't directly over lap the jakartaeetck?


Scott E. Highbarger
[shighbar@xxxxxxxxxx]
Advisory Software Engineer
WebSphere Application Server CTS
IBM Software Group
(303) 773-5264

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev