Re: [jakartaee-spec-project-leads] Update to specification document temp

[Lukas Jungmann <lukas.jungmann@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 7/19/19 3:12 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
> Lukas,
> Nice update to your pom.  But, as Bill has pointed out in another 
> thread, your approach only allows for "Draft" and "Final Release".  What 
> about other interim reviews such as "Draft Review 2", or "Beta", or 
> however you want to indicate progress?

either pass '-Dstatus="whatever You Want"' on the cmd line (as was 
suggested somewhere) - this works because no plugin can override/update 
existing property in maven, it can only 'hide' existing definition 
within its own execution; or if artifact version becomes '1.2-DR2' then 
status gets resolved to 'DR2'. Not as clear as 'Draft Review 2', still 
easy to distinguish from other versions (and easy to spot during 
review). If the version is '1.2-Beta-1' then status gets resolved to 
'Beta-1', which would be fine, I believe.

thanks,
--lukas

> I don't think we need a definitive answer for every component at this 
> point.  Bill pointed out an issue with the current mechanism and 
> provided a potential solution.  If some components would rather go their 
> own route on resolving it, that's fine.  We just need to ensure that 
> somehow the "Final Release" is properly represented in the Specification 
> document.  Thanks!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Kevin Sutter
> STSM, MicroProfile and Jakarta EE architect
> e-mail:  sutter@xxxxxxxxxx     Twitter:  @kwsutter
> phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
>
>
>
> From: Lukas Jungmann <lukas.jungmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: jakartaee-spec-project-leads@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: 07/18/2019 04:50 PM
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [jakartaee-spec-project-leads] Update to 
> specification document template
> Sent by: jakartaee-spec-project-leads-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On 7/18/19 10:40 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
> > We have a fix for the above problem:
> >
> > ifeval::["{revremark}" != ""]
> > Status: {revremark}
> > endif::[]
> > ifeval::["{revremark}" == ""]
> > Status: Final Release
> > endif::[]
>
> while this definitely works, it requires passing '-Dstatus=""' to the
> release build, so in turn change in release jobs eventually
>
> to overcome this limitation, I was thinking about some "automagical"
> way, like what I've just proposed for jsonp:
> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsonp/pull/193
>
> thanks,
> --lukas
>
>
> > You can pick up a new version of the license-efsl.adoc file with the  fix here:
> > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bshannon/spec-template/master/src/main/asciidoc/license-efsl.adoc
> >
> > Please update your spec documents with this fix.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > _______________________________________________
> > jakartaee-spec-project-leads mailing list
> > jakartaee-spec-project-leads@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe  from this list, visit
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-spec-project-leads
> _______________________________________________
> jakartaee-spec-project-leads mailing list
> jakartaee-spec-project-leads@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe 
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-spec-project-leads
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jakartaee-spec-project-leads mailing list
> jakartaee-spec-project-leads@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-spec-project-leads