| Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Plan Review for Jakarta Batch 2.1 |
The vote concluded successfully and passed on June 11:
| Yes | No | Abstain | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fujitsu | +1 | ||
| IBM | +1 | ||
| Oracle | +1 | ||
| Payara | +1 | ||
| Red Hat | +1 | ||
| Tomitribe | +1 | ||
| EE4J PMC | +1 | ||
| Participant Members | +1 | ||
| Committer Members | +1 | ||
| Enterprise Members | +1 | ||
| Total. +10 |
I had the same comments earlier and was wondering if we wanted it fixed or if we could vote anyways.Looks like we can vote and I have already reviewed, so here is my +1 (Tomitribe)On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 5:39 PM Kevin Sutter <sutter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:+1 (IBM)
FYI, the actual link to the PR is here: https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/381(the hotlink in the note below takes you to the wrong PR).
Also, the preview link is here: https://deploy-preview-381--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/batch/2.1/(the hotlink in the note below takes you to the wrong preview).
---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)
From: Scott Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Jakarta specification disccusions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 06/04/2021 11:18
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Plan Review for Jakarta Batch 2.1
Sent by: "jakarta.ee-spec" <jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>Greetings Jakarta EE Specification Committee.
I need your vote to approve the Plan Review of Jakarta Batch 2.1
The JESP/EFSP states a Plan Review provides a means for the Specification Project Team to present their Release Plan to the Project Leadership Chain, the Specification Committee, and the community for feedback. Also, the JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in order to ratify the Plan Review.
The relevant materials are available here:
https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/381
https://deploy-preview-381--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/batch/2.1/
Per the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Friday, Jun 11th , that requires a Super-majoritypositive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification Committee Representatives will be counted.
The Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat, Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J PMC, Participant Members, and Committee Members.
Specification Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated._______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec
_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec