[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Plan Review for Jakarta Batch 2.1
|
+1 (IBM)FYI, the actual
link to the PR is here: https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/381(the hotlink in the note below takes you to the wrong PR).Also, the preview
link is here: https://deploy-preview-381--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/batch/2.1/(the hotlink in the note below takes you to the wrong preview).
---------------------------------------------------
Kevin Sutter
STSM, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile architect @ IBM
e-mail: sutter@xxxxxxxxxx Twitter: @kwsutter
phone: tl-553-3620 (office), 507-253-3620 (office)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevinwsutter
Part-time schedule: Tue, Wed, Thu (off on Mon and Fri)From:
Scott
Stark <starksm64@xxxxxxxxx>To:
Jakarta
specification disccusions <jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx>Date:
06/04/2021
11:18Subject:
[EXTERNAL]
[jakarta.ee-spec] [BALLOT] Plan Review for Jakarta Batch 2.1Sent
by: "jakarta.ee-spec"
<jakarta.ee-spec-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Greetings
Jakarta EE Specification Committee.
I
need your vote to approve the Plan Review of Jakarta
Batch 2.1
The
JESP/EFSP states a Plan Review provides a means for the Specification Project
Team to present their Release Plan to the Project Leadership Chain, the
Specification Committee, and the community for feedback. Also, the
JESP/EFSP requires a successful ballot of the Specification Committee in
order to ratify the Plan Review.
The
relevant materials are available here:
https://github.com/jakartaee/specifications/pull/381
https://deploy-preview-381--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app/specifications/batch/2.1/
Per
the process, this will be a seven-day ballot, ending on Friday, Jun 11th ,
that requires a Super-majoritypositive vote of the Specification Committee members (note that there is
no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by Specification
Committee Representatives will be counted.
The
Specification Committee is composed of representatives of the Jakarta EE
Working Group Member Companies (Fujitsu, IBM, Oracle, Payara, Red Hat,
Tomitribe, and Primeton), along with individuals who represent the EE4J
PMC, Participant Members, and Committee Members.
Specification
Committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond
with +1 (positive), 0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that
you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated._______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-spec mailing list
jakarta.ee-spec@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-spec