Good idea Brad. I will add it. From: iot-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:iot-wg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brad Micklea Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 1:21 PM To: IoT Working Group mailing list <iot-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [iot-wg] IoT Developer Survey 2017 Questions I'd be interested in knowing what IDEs people are using for IoT: {plus any others that I may have missed} On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Hudalla Kai (INST/ESY1) <Kai.Hudalla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Ian,
in the context of developers' plans to use an existing cloud service offering, I'd be interested in developers' opinion regarding vendor lock in when it comes to device connectivity.
In particular, I would be interested in getting to know whether people consider it acceptable for their solution to use a device connectivity service offered by the cloud provider instead of having implemented/deployed it themselves.
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Kai Hudalla Chief Software Architect
Bosch Software Innovations GmbH Schöneberger Ufer 89-91 10785 Berlin GERMANY www.bosch-si.com
Registered office: Berlin, Register court: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 148411 B; Executives: Dr.-Ing. Rainer Kallenbach, Michael Hahn
On Mon, 2017-01-16 at 17:00 -0500, Ian Skerrett wrote: > All, > > The last two years the IoT WG has organized an IoT Developer survey. The > results are available at: > 2016: http://www.slideshare.net/IanSkerrett/iot-developer-survey-2016 > 2015: http://www.slideshare.net/IanSkerrett/iot-developer-survey-2015 > > We are now planning for the 2017 version of the survey. The first step is to > start with the 2016 questions and decide upon the questions for the 2017 > survey. At the next IoT WG call, I’d like to review the following document to > get input from the members on what questions they would like to see in the > survey. We hope to have the questions finalized by the end of January and > field the survey in early February. > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Mz2GP4mJTXCpOHBEgXwGtImirMtrLP2KKMphAam0yp4 > /edit?usp=sharing >
-- |