| Re: [iot-pmc] Fwd: [CQ 22706] Eclipse Arrowhead Third Party library - 3 |
Hi Wayne,
I think I can speak on behalf of the IoT PMC here when I say that we are
happy to support where we can in making the process more efficient.
That said, I do not think that we need to approve the CQs that you are
creating as part of your case study, so by all means, go ahead and +1
those CQs on our behalf. In case of any questions, feel free to get in
touch on this list.
Kai
On 05.11.20 17:14, EMO EMO wrote:
> Greetings IoT PMC.
>
> IP Team member Shawn and I are experimenting with some ideas that we
> have for a new simpler flow through the IP due diligence process and are
> using the CQs submitted by the Eclipse Arrowhead project as a case study.
>
> The gist is that we'd like to start with the "requires further
> investigation" list generated by the license tool and see what we can
> knock off the list without requiring that additional CQs be created. In
> this particular example, we started with three libraries, were able to
> knock two of them off the list by doing a normal diff review (just
> without an extra CQ), but then determined that we need to engage the
> scanner tool on the third library. That's why I attached the source code
> (I'm not sure how well getting the IP Team to hunt down source code is
> going to scale, but we're experimenting right now).
>
> Anyway, during this experiment, I'll likely be the one attaching source
> code and creating additional CQs (in the case where we decide that we
> need to).
>
> I'll offer to approve these CQs (when approval is required) on your
> behalf, but defer to your judgement if you want to stay involved in that
> part of the process.
>
> May I approve these CQs on the PMC's behalf? (I'll follow our usual
> process of accepting a single +1 and no -1s as approval).
>
> Wayne
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: <emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 11:00 AM
> Subject: [iot-pmc] [CQ 22706] Eclipse Arrowhead Third Party library - 3
> To: <iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>
>
> http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22706
> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="">>
>
>
> Genie Eclipse <genie@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:genie@xxxxxxxxxxx>> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Severity|new |awaiting_pmc
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #5 from Genie Eclipse <genie@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:genie@xxxxxxxxxxx>> 2020-11-05 11:00:04 ---
> This CQ is currently awaiting PMC Approval. PMC members only, please use the
> PMC_Approved flag on this CQ to indicate your approval (flag set to "+") or
> disapproval (flag set to "-").
>
>
> --
> Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="">>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the CQ.
> _______________________________________________
> iot-pmc mailing list
> iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
> <https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="">>
>
>
> --
> The Eclipse Management Organization
> Eclipse Foundation
>
> _______________________________________________
> iot-pmc mailing list
> iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="">
>
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Kai Hudalla
Software Developer - Bosch IoT Hub
Bosch.IO GmbH
Ullsteinstr. 128
12109 Berlin
GERMANY
www.bosch.io
Registered Office: Berlin, Registration Court: Amtsgericht
Charlottenburg; HRB 148411 B
Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Dr.-Ing. Thorsten Lücke;
Managing Directors: Dr. Stefan Ferber, Dr. Aleksandar Mitrovic, Yvonne
Reckling
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc