It feels like a legal-ish statement to me as it's on behalf of
the Paho project. If it were my personal statement then that
would be different.
I doubt there would be any ramifications of a false statement in
this particular case, as it's really just a sanity check for OASIS
that a specification is sensible and implementable. But IANAL.
In any case I'll submit it for review.
Thanks, Mike
On 27/06/2018 17:38, Mike Milinkovich
wrote:
On 2018-06-27 12:16 PM, Hudalla Kai
(INST/ECS4) wrote:
FMPOV the Paho project can basically do what it wants :-) That said, if you think
that the work in Paho qualifies for that kind of statement, then I think you
should do so. I do not see any reasons why the Eclipse Foundation should have a
say in this nor should be in a position to prevent you from doing so.
Any other opinions?
Ummm. No. Eclipse projects should not make legal statements
themselves without involved the Eclipse Foundation.
Maybe I'm reading Ian's request incorrectly, but this sounds
legal-ish to me.
![Avast logo]()
|
This email has been checked for
viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
|
_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
--
Ian Craggs
icraggs@xxxxxxxxxx IBM United Kingdom
Eclipse Paho Project Lead & Mosquitto Committer
