Re: [iot-pmc] CQs lacking version information

[Jens Reimann <jreimann@xxxxxxxxxx>]

A simple thought would be … if a CQ isn't complete, then we cannot process it.

We could ask for the CQ to be fixed, but in case of a missing version information the user cannot fix this IIRC. So closing it out with an explanation could be an appropriate way to handle this.

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Hudalla Kai (INST/ECS4) <kai.hudalla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi there,

on the IoT PMC we are currently seeing a lot of type A CQs coming in for artifacts of a particular version that do not contain the version in the CQ's "name" field.

Given that the license check for type A is a fully automated process (if everything works out), I wonder if we end up with approved CQs that do not contain any version information. If so, should we reject such CQs?

Thoughts?

--

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards

Kai Hudalla
Chief Software Architect

Bosch Software Innovations GmbH
Ullsteinstraße 128
12109 Berlin
GERMANY
www.bosch-si.com

Registered Office: Berlin, Registration Court: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg; HRB 148411 B
Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Dr.-Ing. Thorsten Lücke; Managing Directors: Dr.-Ing. Rainer Kallenbach, Michael Hahn

_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc

--

Jens Reimann
Senior Software Engineer / EMEA ENG Middleware
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14
85630 Grasbrunn
Germany
phone: +49 89 2050 71286
_____________________________________________________________________________

Red Hat GmbH, www.de.redhat.com,
Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill