Re: [incubation] Fast releasing projects

["Sohn, Matthias" <matthias.sohn@xxxxxxx>]

I think it’s good to create the release records in the portal to publish releases

so that users can find this information for all projects in a uniform way. Also PMI

provides some automation which I find useful.

 

Though the mandatory review period and the small number of review slots (2 per month)

Is in the way of fast release cycles.

 

Maybe we could get rid of the rigid release review process and replace it by a more

flexible one based on lazy consensus on a release review mailing list.

E.g.

project publishes release records and IP log on release review mailing list and asks for release review

(not on the current fixed bi-weekly schedule, but at any date). If PMC accepts the release and

no one else objects on the release review list within e.g. 3 days the review is considered successful

and the release can be published.

 

-Matthias

 

From: <incubation-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: Discussions for new Eclipse projects <incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, 28. March 2018 at 17:09
To: Discussions for new Eclipse projects <incubation@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [incubation] Fast releasing projects

 

 

 

On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Gorkem Ercan <gorkem.ercan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Isn’t the Release notes (the new & noteworthy) a better format the outsiders audience?

 

Probably. However at the moment, I don't think such N&N external documents are sustainable enough (in term of URL location and so on) to meet the quality criteria of typical Eclipse governance.