Re: [higgins-dev] With 7 people having voted so far...

["Uppili Srinivasan" <uppili.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

A graph is a conceptual tool and the term "node" is a term that is part of that concept, irrespective of what a graph is used to represent.    But in the HGG data model, "nodes" represent entities in the Identity system. 

 

So if you are referring to the graph abstractly, then "node" seems ok.  But in the context of HGG, aren't we trying to name the items represented by nodes in the graph?

 

Leaning towards entity (but staying away from voting :-)

 

regards,

Uppili

----- Original Message -----

From: Paul Trevithick

To: 'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'

Cc: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 8:01 PM

Subject: RE: [higgins-dev] With 7 people having voted so far...

Anyone who votes for entity has the extra burden of suggesting a second word to replace “real world” entities (like people, objects, organizations, software programs, etc.) that are being represented by a node-whatever.

 

---

From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Anthony Nadalin
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 5:43 PM
To: Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions
Cc: Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions; higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [higgins-dev] With 7 people having voted so far...

 

Open to everyone that votes for "entity"

Anthony Nadalin | Work 512.838.0085 | Cell 512.289.4122

"Uppili Srinivasan" ---02/24/2008 04:34:15 PM---Is this voting a privilege for only the contributors or can interested commons vote? :-)

From:	"Uppili Srinivasan" <uppili.srinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:	"Higgins \(Trust Framework\) Project developer discussions" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	02/24/2008 04:34 PM
Subject:	Re: [higgins-dev] With 7 people having voted so far...

---

Is this voting a privilege for only the contributors or can interested commons vote? :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Trevithick
To: 'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 12:11 PM
Subject: RE: [higgins-dev] With 7 people having voted so far...

Sorry, should have been more clear about that. Yes, vote for more than one.

[Greg, if you find another computer/device with a different IP address, you can vote again and add your missing input. Let me know if that’s not good enough]

---

From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Byrd
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 1:36 PM
To: Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions
Subject: Re: [higgins-dev] With 7 people having voted so far...

Hmm. Seven responders and 12 responses. I didn't know we could/should vote for more than one.

...Greg

---

_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev

---

_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev