[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [gmf-dev] GMF 2.1.0M6 :: Status Update
|
Right, and the are here now only because of the build migration. We used to
package them as part of the build, but now are switching back to the method
where they are zipped and included within the development workspace. It's
simple, and they do not seem to change much anyway.
- Rich
On 4/11/08 10:01 AM, "Anthony Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Yes, the zipped examples should not be in the SDK. This is
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=226511 that we raised earlier
> on. The zipped examples were not in the SDK in previous releases.
>
> Cheers...
> Anthony
> --
> Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
> Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
> IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GMF / Modeling Tools
> Phone: 613-270-4613
>
>
>
> |------------>
> | From: |
> |------------>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> |
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |------------>
> | To: |
> |------------>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> |
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |------------>
> | Date: |
> |------------>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |04/11/2008 08:59 AM
> |
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |------------>
> | Subject: |
> |------------>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
> |Re: [gmf-dev] GMF 2.1.0M6 :: Status Update
> |
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
>
>
>
>
> To be more clear...
>
> The *.examples.pde.ui will still be available in the SDK, along with the
> zipped examples. What won't be present are the example plug-ins themselves
> in the SDK, which is causing the current installation dependency and UI
> pollution issue.
>
> Thanks,
> Rich
>
>
> On 4/11/08 8:11 AM, "Richard Gronback" <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> To make it worse, EPP cannot build until we resolve this, so I've asked
> Max
>> to go ahead with removing the Examples from our SDK and build an M6a.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rich
>>
>>
>> On 4/11/08 7:56 AM, "Richard Gronback" <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>>> On the topic of the examples... In the current M6 build, examples are
>>> included
>>> in the SDK. This was a side effect of moving to the new builder, but
> causes
>>> a
>>> problem for Ganymede. This is because of the dependency our examples
> have on
>>> the EMF examples, but which aren't part of Ganymede. So, it's
> impossible to
>>> install GMF's SDK from Ganymede easily.
>>>
>>> As stated here, I propose we remove the examples from the SDK and build
> an
>>> M6a: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=226511#c4
>>>
>>> Does anyone have an issue with this? By the way, another unfortunate
> side
>>> effect of installing examples with the SDK is the pollution of the UI
> (e.g.
>>> the top-level menu "Diagram Services Samples")
>>>
>>> Another thing I noticed testing M6 is that I was unable to load our
>>> site-interim.xml manifest in a p2-enabled platform. Using a 3.4M5
> platform,
>>> all went well, as long as I also used the EMF interim site to grab the
>>> dependent EMF examples. Using a 3.4M6 platform, I get the message
> "Error
>>> reading the update site at
>>> http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/gmf/updates/site-interim.xml";
>>>
>>> Meanwhile, the Ganymede staging URL is accepted fine:
>>> http://download.eclipse.org/releases/ganymede/staging/
>>>
>>> Nick, have you noticed this p2-unfriendly symptom in your generated site
>>> manifests before?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Rich
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/9/08 10:58 AM, "Anthony Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Richard,
>>>>
>>>> The issues we need to solve for M6. If we have any issues getting these
>>>> done we need to comment in these Bugzillas:
>>>>
>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225968
>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225803
>>>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=225804
>>>>
>>>> I also know there was an issue with pde.examples, but I do not see a
>>>> Bugzilla for it. pde.examples is not blocking though.
>>>>
>>>> I also need to comment out a few additional JUnits that failed on
> Linux,
>>>> just need to know which ones. Although failing JUnits do not block M6.
>>>>
>>>> I do not think there are any others?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers...
>>>> Anthony
>>>> --
>>>> Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
>>>> IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GMF / Modeling Tools
>>>> Phone: 613-270-4613
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> |------------>
>>>> | From: |
>>>> |------------>
>>>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>
>
>
>>
>> -
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>> |Richard Gronback <richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> |
>>>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>
>
>
>>
>> -
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>> |------------>
>>>> | To: |
>>>> |------------>
>>>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>
>
>
>>
>> -
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>> |"GMF Project developer discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> |
>>>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>
>
>
>>
>> -
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>> |------------>
>>>> | Date: |
>>>> |------------>
>>>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>
>
>
>>
>> -
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>> |04/09/2008 10:07 AM
>>>>> |
>>>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>
>
>
>>
>> -
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>> |------------>
>>>> | Subject: |
>>>> |------------>
>>>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>
>
>
>>
>> -
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>> |Re: [gmf-dev] GMF 2.1.0M6 :: Status Update
>>>>> |
>>>>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------->>>
>
>
>>
>> -
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The Orbit bundles are no being packaged properly at the moment, and Max
> is
>>>> looking into the reason. So, the Orbit issue is not actually fixed
> yet.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the emft site is painfully slow to access, due to active building
> I
>>>> suppose. Clearly, a motivation for the enablement of the builder to be
>>>> configured and executed locally.
>>>>
>>>> I'll reply again once Max resolves the Orbit issue. The plan remains
> to
>>>> build M6 today.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Rich
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4/9/08 9:46 AM, "Anthony Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Team,
>>>>>
>>>>> Any word on a status update?
>>>>>
>>>>> We talked yesterday about commenting out the failing JUnit tests.
> Since
>>>>> then the Junit framework cannot find some of the bundles. See
>>>>> http://emft.eclipse.org/modeling/gmf/gmf/downloads/drops//2.1.0
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
/I200804090807/testresults/html/org.eclipse.gmf.tests.runtime.draw2d.ui.rende>>
>
>
>>
>> r
>>>>
>>>>> _linux.gtk.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Any word on resolving the open Bugzillas? Nick seemed to indicate that
>>>> the
>>>>> orbit one was fixed but there are no comments indicating any
> resolution.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please comment back in emails and the Bugzillas so we know what to
>>>> retest.
>>>>>
>>>>> p.s. emft.eclipse.org has a deadly slow response this morning.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers...
>>>>> Anthony
>>>>> --
>>>>> Anthony Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Software Development Manager: Eclipse Open Source Components
>>>>> IBM Rational Software: Aurora / GMF / Modeling Tools
>>>>> Phone: 613-270-4613
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> gmf-dev mailing list
>>>>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gmf-dev mailing list
>>>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gmf-dev mailing list
>>>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gmf-dev mailing list
>> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmf-dev mailing list
> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gmf-dev mailing list
> gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
