[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [gmf-dev] Proposal for an early GMF 1.0.2 release
|
Anthony,
Could you please describe commit policy runtime
team going to adhere during 1.0.2 and 1.0.3 development - i.e. is it the same as
with 1.0.1 (no fixes in 2.0 stream, all fixes from maintenance stream get into
HEAD at the end of a cycle), or we might expect to see fixes propagated to 2.0
right away.
Thank you!
Best wishes,
Artem Tikhomirov
I have updated the maintenance
section in http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/GMF_Project_Plan
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony
Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Manager: Eclipse GMF + GEF
IBM
Rational Software: Aurora / Modeling Tools
Phone:
613-591-7037
Richard Gronback
<richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: gmf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
04/10/2006 06:41 AM
Please respond
to "GMF Project developer discussions."
<gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| "GMF Project developer
discussions." <gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| Re: [gmf-dev] Proposal for an
early GMF 1.0.2 release |
|
This seems reasonable to me, and has limited impact to
releng. The 29th is a Sunday, so perhaps the 27th is better? We’ll
just need to update our plan documents to reflect this additional
release.
Thanks,
Rich
On 10/3/06 4:42 PM, "Anthony
Hunter" <anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Team,
The WTP project has requested a maintenance
release for October 29. The request has been approved by the WTP PMC and here
is the link to the thread. http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/wtp-pmc/msg00896.html
I have been requested by the IBM team to do the
same for GMF. UML2 and TPTP are also looking at doing this.
Here's
what I propose for your agreement (or dissent).
We will plan a 1.0.2
maintenance release for October 29.
We will still plan a 1.0.3 maintenance
release approximately January/February following the rest of Callisto release
train.
We currently have 10 Bugzillas targeted against the 1.0.2
maintenance release.
It is unfortunate these issues were found late,
but I think we can accommodate this "extra release" with minimal
disruption,
if we keep the fixes to the bare minimum absolutely required,
and it will drastically improve our perceived quality in some areas.
Sound agreeable?
Cheers...
Anthony
--
Anthony
Hunter mailto:anthonyh@xxxxxxxxxx
Manager: Eclipse GMF + GEF
IBM Rational Software:
Aurora / Modeling Tools
Phone: 613-591-7037
_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing
list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev
--
Richard C. Gronback
Borland Software
Corporation
richard.gronback@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1 860 227 9215_______________________________________________
gmf-dev mailing
list
gmf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gmf-dev