Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [faces-dev] Should jakarta.faces.annotation.ManagedProperty be removed from the Faces 4.0 SPEC API?


On 5/31/22 6:46 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:

Note that https://jakarta.oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/staging/jakarta/faces/jakarta.faces-api/4.0.0/jakarta.faces-api-4.0.0-javadoc.jar does seem to have `jakarta.faces.annotation.ManagedProperty`.

Tracking issue is https://github.com/jakartaee/faces/issues/1685

On 5/31/22 1:44 PM, Scott Marlow wrote:

The Faces 4.0 apidocs [1] doesn't contain class `jakarta.faces.annotation.ManagedProperty` but the Faces 4.0 SPEC API does [2].  Which is right? 

Note that the Platform TCK [3] also references the jakarta.faces.annotation.ManagedProperty class as well.  Same for the Faces TCK [4][5].  Faces + Platform TCK Signature tests do as well.

Scott

[1] https://jakarta.ee/specifications/faces/4.0/apidocs/
[2] https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/jakarta/faces/jakarta.faces-api/4.0.0/jakarta.faces-api-4.0.0.jar
[3] https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/blob/master/src/com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/common/lite/EJBLiteJsfClientBase.java#L74
[4] https://github.com/jakartaee/faces/blob/master/tck/faces23/getViews/src/main/java/ee/jakarta/tck/faces/test/servlet40/getviews/GetViewResourcesBean.java#L41
[5] https://github.com/jakartaee/faces/blob/master/tck/faces23/getViews/src/main/java/ee/jakarta/tck/faces/test/servlet40/getviews/GetViewsBean.java#L49

Back to the top