| [faces-dev] Should jakarta.faces.annotation.ManagedProperty be removed from the Faces 4.0 SPEC API? |
The Faces 4.0 apidocs [1] doesn't contain class
`jakarta.faces.annotation.ManagedProperty` but the Faces 4.0 SPEC
API does [2]. Which is right?
Note that the Platform TCK [3] also references the jakarta.faces.annotation.ManagedProperty
class as well. Same for the Faces TCK [4][5]. Faces + Platform
TCK Signature tests do as well.
Scott
[1] https://jakarta.ee/specifications/faces/4.0/apidocs/
[2]
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/jakarta/faces/jakarta.faces-api/4.0.0/jakarta.faces-api-4.0.0.jar
[3]
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/blob/master/src/com/sun/ts/tests/ejb30/common/lite/EJBLiteJsfClientBase.java#L74
[4]
https://github.com/jakartaee/faces/blob/master/tck/faces23/getViews/src/main/java/ee/jakarta/tck/faces/test/servlet40/getviews/GetViewResourcesBean.java#L41
[5]
https://github.com/jakartaee/faces/blob/master/tck/faces23/getViews/src/main/java/ee/jakarta/tck/faces/test/servlet40/getviews/GetViewsBean.java#L49