Re: [epp-dev] Moving a package to Java 11 as requirement

["Daniel Megert" <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>]

You removed this:

> But
for the IDE itself it should be possible to run on higher Java versions
than the product, so I personally don't have any objections if some packages
would move.

I was taking IDE
as the Eclipse SDK/IDE. My comment was not for anything else.

Dani



From:
       Mickael
Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
       Eclipse
Packaging Project <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       01.03.2020
19:28
Subject:
       [EXTERNAL]
Re: [epp-dev] Moving a package to Java 11 as requirement
Sent
by:        epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

---

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 9:27 AM Daniel
Megert <daniel_megert@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
No, it is not
OK for the same arguments mentioned before.

Can you please remind those arguments?
I'm curious about which ones apply to typical Corrosion target audience.
Also -and without any offense but more
to clarify who has influence/authority on EPP project as it's facing a
transition-, I'm curious about whether your opinion as Planning Council
member but non-EPP committers is to be considered as binding. WDYT?_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev