Re: [ejb-dev] Request for review on PR# 74 and 75

["Tracy Burroughs" <tkb@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ah, right, JTS is
only mentioned in one part of the EJB spec, which in a nutshell says it
isn't required.  Since the JTS spec won't be part of Jakarta EE, should
we just drop that section from the Jakarta Enterprise Beans spec, and then
not reference the old JTS spec?


-- Tracy Burroughs (tkb@xxxxxxxxxx)
-- WebSphere Application Server Development
-- IBM Rochester,  Dept WG8A    H315/050-2
-- 2800 37th Street NW, Rochester MN 55901-4441




From:
       Bill
Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:
       ejb
developer discussions <ejb-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Tracy Burroughs <tkb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
       03/04/2020
12:38 PM
Subject:
       [EXTERNAL]
Re: [ejb-dev] Request for review on PR# 74 and 75

---

Tracy Burroughs wrote on 3/4/20 8:46
AM:
Java™ API for XML-based
RPC, version 1.1 (JAX-RPC)should
go away.  My understanding is that would not be in Jakarta EE 9, and
all references to it should be removed from the EJB 4.0 specification.
I agree.

Not sure about
JSR 109.  If there isn't a Jakarta version of that spec, then it too
should be eliminated.  What part of the EJB spec is referencing it?
It should remain; see my previous message.

The "Java
Transaction Service" is a important part of the EJB specification...
and there must be some Jakarta spec that covers it, but I don't know where
that went.

JTS is the implementation under JTA. 
None of the JTS APIs are part of the spec.