Re: [ee4j-pmc] Proposal: Request for explanations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ee4j-pmc] Proposal: Request for explanations

From: arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 00:30:40 +0200
Delivered-to: ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:ee4j-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc>, <mailto:ee4j-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ee4j-pmc>, <mailto:ee4j-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Hi,

On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 12:52 PM Ivar Grimstad <ivar.grimstad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

spec + api in one repo
The reasoning for keeping spec+api in the same repository is for simplicity and assuming that you would always release them together.

Another reason may be that the API Javadoc is, or at least used to be, part of the spec as well.

Kind regards,

Arjan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ee4j-pmc] Proposal: Request for explanations
  - From: Markus KARG

References:
- [ee4j-pmc] Proposal: Request for explanations
  - From: Markus KARG
- Re: [ee4j-pmc] Proposal: Request for explanations
  - From: Ivar Grimstad

Prev by Date: Re: [ee4j-pmc] Proposal: Request for explanations
Next by Date: Re: [ee4j-pmc] Proposal: Request for explanations
Previous by thread: Re: [ee4j-pmc] Proposal: Request for explanations
Next by thread: Re: [ee4j-pmc] Proposal: Request for explanations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs