Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] SimRel Naming

[Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On May 4, 2018, at 12:43, Ed Merks <ed.merks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Part of my "too narrow IDE focus" is caused by combining 1 with 2+3. I think 2+3 must have IDE in it's brand name (and URLs).

A segment in a URL is not a brand. :P 

Why not? It has been the brand for many many years now....

So, why not focus the discussion on the URL (segment)? Maybe it will be helpful on our path towards solving the name issue?

http://download.eclipse.org/releases/latest

Another question: why on earth deserves the Eclipse IDE stuff to be special? What if Jakarta wants to put a Maven repo at http://download.eclipse.org/releases/latest?

-Gunnar

-- 
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/