Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] DSDP-NAB on Ganymatic

[Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ganymedians,
I admit that I agree with Nick: if, um, NAB didn't notice that they weren't part of the Ganymede update site January-June, they didn't really participate in Ganymede, did they?

I'm happy to run Ganymatic so that they can test their sc file, but I don't see re-releasing Ganymede to include them.

That's just my opinion,
Bjorn

Nick Boldt wrote:

I'm all for inclusion & forgiving mistakes, but isn't one of the requirements for participation that you, um, test the Ganymede site to ensure your bits can be installed from there? Surely if this project had been testing the Ganymede staging site this would have been caught & fixed months ago.

--

[end of message]