Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Eclipse vs Vi vs Sublime

[Jay Jay Billings <jayjaybillings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mikael,  I'll gladly turn that into an enhancement request. What's the appropriate project for that to go under?

As for the part about quick editors, let's suppose that you are right and that we are not competing with these tools. Then maybe we should. An ostensibly lighter, faster, more focused Eclipse wouldn't hurt us if it had to be enabled to work in the "lighter mode" through a preference, but it might pick up some folks and convert them to the IDE-loving crowd and it might keep a few more.

Max, thanks for the tip of opening on the command line! It worked on Linux. That would be really slick if it could auto-discover the workspace.

Jay

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Max Rydahl Andersen <manderse@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 15 Mar 2016, at 18:38, Mickael Istria wrote:

 "Quick" editors and IDEs are not competing, they're complementary and many people use both. IMO, that's perfectly fine.

I disagree. Yes you can use them side-by-side and I do that frequently.

Primarily because the "eclipse myfile.txt" is semi-broken on OSX.

If this was fixed I would use eclipse way more.

/max
http://about.me/maxandersen

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.

--

Jay Jay Billings

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Twitter Handle: @jayjaybillings