Hi Dani, all -
The “Dormant” status was always a method for tracking attendance only, and not for limiting AC member’s privileges.
I’m not sure what the EDP has to say about Dormant Status (could you point me to anything?) but the status
quo as I know it is written in [1] and [2].
It’s true that dormant members are prime candidates to ask for resigning, but until that happens they are
still appointed members of the AC with all rights to vote. In fact, casting a vote gets them out of the Dormant
State since it’s a sign of activity
J
Bottomline, I’d encourage everyone to put their comment and vote on the FEEP proposals, regardless of Dormant or not.
[1]
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Architecture_Council/Dormant_Status
[2]
https://wiki.eclipse.org/Architecture_Council/Templates/Dormant
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner – Development Tools,
Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85 fax +43.662.457915.6
From: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Wayne Beaton
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 10:37 PM
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] FEEP Voting, Iteration #1
I think that, strictly speaking, Martin has the last work.
IMHO, all current mentors (active or not) should vote.
Wayne
On 18/11/15 05:19 PM, Daniel Megert wrote:
Hey Tom
I think according to the latest EDP changes dormant members are subject to garbage collection ;-). But first, Wayne has the last word here and second, at least to me any voice counts.
Dani
From: Tom Schindl
<tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 18.11.2015 23:15
Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] FEEP Voting, Iteration #1
Sent by: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Are dormat AC members allowed to cast their vote as well?
Tom
On 18.11.15 22:57, Daniel Megert wrote:
> Let me start by saying that I told Marcel that Platform, JDT and PDE
> would really like to investigate AND FIX the error reports but there's
> just not enough resources. Hence I appreciate the direction this takes.
>
> Having said that, I see that the summary in bugzilla for both items got
> changed, and in the poll the summary got changed for the Platform
> developer (but not for JDT). Maybe it's just the Swiss in me but,
> personally I perceive this as forging my vote and feel not comfortable
> with this at all. In my opinion we should not touch those things while
> the vote is active. I suggest to revert all those changes and suggest
> new FEEPs, especially because the deadline for this vote has been set to
> end this afternoon.
>
> Dani
>
>
>
> From: Marcel Bruch <marcel.bruch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "eclipse.org-architecture-council eclipse.org"
> <eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 18.11.2015 21:10
> Subject: Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] FEEP Voting,
> Iteration #1
> Sent by: eclipse.org-architecture-council-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> A short heads up:
>
> As suggested by John Arthorne, I’ve changed the subject of the funding
> full-time developers for Platform UI and JDT UI as follows:
>
> Bug 480024 - [FEEP][jdt] Fund a developer to triage and fix the most
> frequently occurring errors in JDT
> Bug 482037 - [FEEP][platform] Fund a developer to triage and fix the
> most frequently occurring errors in Platform UI
>
> Reason: The amount of time is not key to this proposal. Triaging and
> fixing is.
>
> If this change matters to you, please update your votes.
>
> Thank you,
> Marcel
>
>
>
>> Am 18.11.2015 um 15:58 schrieb Pascal Rapicault
<pascal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> As a matter of discussion, transparency and record tracking, I propose
> that each negative vote to be motivated in the respective bug.
>>
>> Pascal
>>
>> On 15-11-18 09:20 AM, Marcel Bruch wrote:
>>> This is a friendly reminder to provide your input on how/where to
> spent the FEEP funding today [1]. So far 10 AI provided feedback.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mxRX9CCveSgD1abemlBCOAW1zQfyi22HIq7awVfkc_s/edit#gid=0
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
>>>
>>> eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
>>>
>>>
>>> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal
> to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list,
> you must contact
>>> emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
>> eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
>>
>> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal
> to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list,
> you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
>
> --
> Codetrails GmbH
> The knowledge transfer company
>
> Robert-Bosch-Str. 7, 64293 Darmstadt
> Phone: +49-6151-276-7092
> Mobile: +49-179-131-7721
> http://www.codetrails.com/
>
> Managing Director: Dr. Marcel Bruch
> Handelsregister: Darmstadt HRB 91940
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
>
> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
> the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you
> must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
>
> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
>
--
Thomas Schindl, CTO
BestSolution.at EDV Systemhaus GmbH
Eduard-Bodem-Gasse 5-7, A-6020 Innsbruck
http://www.bestsolution.at/
Reg. Nr. FN 222302s am Firmenbuchgericht Innsbruck
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact
emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
--
Wayne Beaton
@waynebeaton
The Eclipse Foundation
