RE: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Next MTJ Call: 21/July/2008 - meeting minutes

["Raniere Hugo-wha006" <wha006@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Craig, 

By now we are trying to have antenna preprocessor approved to use by IP
team (https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2444). Omry has
already commited to contribute this code and I think we will be OK with
this CQ, if not for this release, for the next one.

The missing thing is the hooks stuff which I did not have time to
understand at all. As you have more knowledge about the problem, it
would be great with you start the discussions with OSGi guys. Please,
include us in the loop so we can keep it if you run out of time.

Hugo

-----Original Message-----
From: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Craig Setera
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 8:03 PM
To: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
Subject: Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Next MTJ Call: 21/July/2008 - meeting
minutes

Eric,

I understand your thinking on this... but I still have some concerns 
about how this is going to work out.  My ultimate goal is to retire 
EclipseME when MTJ is ready to replace it.  For those that are using the

preprocessor support, MTJ will not be ready... which stretches the 
lifetime of EclipseME and therefore my necessary commitment to that 
project.  Time spent on EclipseME is time not spent on MTJ... And given 
how little time I'm finding these days that could be significant.

I think splitting out the preprocessor is something we should seriously 
consider.  The other alternative is to find a way to get this through 
legal approval...

Did anyone ever talk to the OSGi guys about the ability to use a jar 
file in those hooks?  Is that something that I should ask them about?

Thanks,
Craig

Hildum Eric-XFQ473 wrote:
> I would rather not split this out and have a hybrid project. On the 
> other hand, I do not want to delay things any further than absolutely 
> necessary. My feeling is we should keep the preprocessor inside MTJ, 
> but do the next release(s) with our current capability (that is, 
> without preprocessor).
>  
>  
> Eric Hildum
> Senior Product Manager, Mobile Developer Tools & SDK
> Software Platforms and Delivery
> Ecosystem and Market Development
> Motorola
> Direct: +1-408-541-6809
> Mobile: +1-510-305-0801
>  
> 809 11th Avenue
> Sunnyvale, CA 94089
> USA
>  
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Craig Setera
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 22, 2008 14:12
> *To:* Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
> *Subject:* Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Next MTJ Call: 21/July/2008 - meeting 
> minutes
>
> I was thinking about the preprocessor issues.  I'd hate to lose that 
> support, but I'd also hate to have it hold up the release.  I'm 
> wondering if we should also consider an option where we split that 
> functionality out of the base plugins and I host it outside of 
> Eclipse?  It would take some work, but it might be the best of both 
> worlds for those that still want that functionality on top of MTJ.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On Jul 21, 2008, at 9:51 AM, Paula Gustavo-WGP010 wrote:
>
>> the wiki is updated with the meeting minutes (thanks to christian 
>> that took note of everything)
>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/DSDP/MTJ/Phone_Meeting_21-July-2008
>>  
>> feel free to add or send comments
>>  
>> :)
>> gep
>>  
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
>> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>   
_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev