Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [cu-dev] BALLOT to allow opting in to virtual threads (vote by Tues Sept 12)

-1 (non-binding)

We don't think a simple flag will be sufficient for configuring allowing a user application to make use of virtual threads

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 8:59 AM Nathan Rauh via cu-dev <cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In order to make progress on Jakarta Concurrency 3.1, we need to resolve the question of whether or not the specification will include a way for users to provide a hint requesting that if possible managed executors and managed thread factories should run on or create virtual threads rather than platform threads. Issue 268 https://github.com/jakartaee/concurrency/issues/268 has some background discussion.

 

A vote of +1 is a vote for adding a hint for requesting virtual threads rather than platform threads.

 

A vote of 0 is a vote to abstain and is not counted for or against the proposal.

 

A vote of -1 is a vote for leaving the Concurrency specification without any way for users to indicate their preference for virtual vs platform threads.

 

This vote will be counted by simple majority of +1 or -1 votes from Jakarta Concurrency specification committers as listed in https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/ee4j.cu/who

 

Non-committers are encouraged to vote as a measure of community sentiment.

 

This BALLOT will run until Tuesday 2023-09-12 10:00AM CDT or when all committers have voted, whichever comes first.

 

_______________________________________________
cu-dev mailing list
cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cu-dev

Back to the top