Re: [cu-dev] [jakartaee-platform-dev] Come up with new name for the Conc

[Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Strictly speaking a restructuring review is required. Once you make the decision to do that, send a quick note to the EMO with a one sentence description of what you're doing and we'll schedule and execute the review. In the meantime, make sure that you inform the various communities involved of the change. The review itself will serve as the announcement of the change to the membership and a record of the change will be recorded in the project metadata. Restructuring reviews tend to just be informational to the community and you just informing the EMO of the change is all that you need to do (we'll take care of the rest).

In terms of mechanically how, that's up to the project teams. You can ask the IT team to just change project ownership of an existing repository if that's what you prefer. Or they can create a new repository. They can also help you split a repository if that needs to happen...

Wayne

On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 8:36 AM arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 7:24 PM Steve Millidge (Payara) <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

So are other repos under the Glassfish "project" so nothing prevents use outside of Eclipse GlassFish.  Is there likely to be a separate group of committers who want to form an additional project? Do other implementations use it and do they want a separate project?

There's indeed no other group of committers that I know of. The concurrency implementation jar is (or was) used by WildFly according to the table here: https://arjan-tijms.omnifaces.org/2020/05/implementation-components-used-by.html

I'd be fine with moving it to GlassFish. How would we do that officially? Ask for PMC agreement, then just create a new GlassFish repo and push the code to there? Maybe look at the Sonatype staging rules to see if the GlassFish bot has the correct rights, and that probably would be it?

Kind regards,

Arjan Tijms

 

Steve

Get Outlook for Android

---

From: jakartaee-platform-dev <jakartaee-platform-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Markus Karg <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2022 5:44:10 PM
To: 'jakartaee-platform developer discussions' <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; 'cu developer discussions' <cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] [cu-dev] Come up with new name for the Concurrency implementation project

 

Because it is freely usable outside of GlassFish?

-Markus

 

 

Von: jakartaee-platform-dev [mailto:jakartaee-platform-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Steve Millidge (Payara)
Gesendet: Sonntag, 3. April 2022 17:48
An: cu developer discussions
Cc: jakartaee-platform developer discussions
Betreff: Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] [cu-dev] Come up with new name for the Concurrency implementation project

 

tbh I think it should just be moved under the GlassFish project. I don't see why we need a separate project. 

 

Get Outlook for Android

---

From: cu-dev <cu-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2022 2:48:20 PM
To: cu developer discussions <cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: jakartaee-platform developer discussions <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cu-dev] Come up with new name for the Concurrency implementation project

 

Hi,

 

On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 5:44 AM David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Is there already an Eclipse project for the "Concurrency RI" that is separate from the Jakarta Currency project and committers?

 

If there is a separate project, this conversation should likely be moved to that list.  If not, we should create that project and let those committers decide.

 

Nope, for some reason the specification project for Concurrency and the implementation got initially delivered in the same Eclipse project.

 

As there's already a separate repo and everything I think the process is purely administrative to make the current "Concurrency RI" a separate project. I'd like to propose a new project using the usual tools and just say it's a restructuring. The only thing we'd really need to get that started is a name I guess.

 

Kind regards,

Arjan

 

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev

_______________________________________________
cu-dev mailing list
cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cu-dev

--

Wayne Beaton

Director of Open Source Projects | Eclipse Foundation

My working day may not be your working day! Please don’t feel obliged to read or reply to this e-mail outside of your normal working hours.