[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cu-dev] [jakartaee-tck-dev] Removing Concurrency TCK tests from platform repository
|
On 2/25/22 11:04 AM, Kyle Aure wrote:
Hello All,
Thanks for all the feedback.
Since the last update to this topic both of the outstanding
issues brought up on removing the Concurrency TCK from the
platform-tck have been contradicted.
I agree, I did give the impression that a Standalone TCK must
include Java SE tests and that is not true, thanks for pointing this
contradiction out! :-)
In this case, I was brief in my description of what has
been moved from the platform TCK to the standalone TCK.
What I meant to say was that we did not port over the
"vehicle" test infrastructure, since the only tests that used
that feature were the API tests which only tested method
return values and exception paths which do not depend on where
they run to verify.
So for now all the API tests are only running on servlets.
However, we do still have EJB and JSP tests for the code
paths where that matters, such as context propagation.
For this issue, it was pointed out that the Platform
Concurrent TCK never ran against Java SE and so we should not
be expected to run against Java SE as part of the Standalone
Concurrent TCK.
I responded on the issue https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/issues/179
that it is perfectly fine for a Standalone TCK to only include
Jakarta EE container testing.
+1 but only after it has been reviewed to check for potential
issues.
Scott
Thanks, everyone for your time,
Kyle Jon Aure
Adding Platform mailing list.
Thanks Kyle for sending this!
Scott
Good Afternoon,
I recently opened a PR to remove the concurrency
TCK tests from the Platform TCK repository
I did this because I helped port the Concurrency
TCK tests to be a standalone project as part of the
concurrency-api repository.
I have already received some feedback on the
removal of the TCK from the platform repository that
we need to implement some additional requirements:
I am working on solutions for both of these
issues, but they are unlikely to be implemented
until after Jakarta 10.
I was asked to send out this email by Scott
Marlow to get some more feedback on removing the TCK
from the platform repository, and if there is
anything else that still needs to be implemented in
our standalone TCK.
Thank you for your time,
KYLE JON AURE
WebSphere Development
Office: Roch Bldg 50-2 H220
Phone: 507-253-8454
Email: kyle.aure@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev
_______________________________________________
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev
_______________________________________________
cu-dev mailing list
cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cu-dev