Team,
Another series of questions from Srinivas… These are
interesting questions… and we need answers to enable QA to properly scope
the i9 testing (ER 216529 Define scope and detail the i9 QA activities).
This is also a continuation of the thread of the Management Domain – Data
Broker – Data Manager being “tightly-coupled”, at least in
the current architecture….
Hubert / Sheldon / Mark,
Do you see this change
between now and i11? Should we talk about this in the next Arch call?
Thanks,
Jimmy
Query from Srinivas Doma
2.
Data Managers
-
During i8
iteration, we saw Data
Managers are
registering to default broker automatically? I feel it should ask
for Broker EPR and then
register,
so that we can have broker running anywhere (local or remote machine)
-
Also all 4 Data Managers are getting
up instantly
with single command? Can
we have some control over them in bringing up/down of desired data
managers?
-
When we bring down
Data Managers, why
don’t it de-registers from broker? So that user cannot query for data on inactive data
mangers.