In reality there are very few differences which would be of interest to the outside world over and above "experiment/innovate" versus "stable evolution"
It is very difficult to get agreement on a list of features as saying one group has this or that feature implies the other doesn't have it.
IMHO, the "why" there are two WGs is essentially historic and therefore of little interest other than to tech historians. You wouldn't start from here when starting over.
I'm for removing the slides.
Steve
+1 to retain the 2 slides.
Without then, there is no explanation as to why there are 2 working groups.
I’m not sure if we can come to a consensus on the MP/EE
comparison
slides. Scott and I have taken two shots at the slide(s). I have withdrawn the slides from the messaging deck in an effort to move forward.
If there is a desire to retain the slides in some form, feel free to comment on this thread.
Thanks.
cn4j-alliance mailing list
cn4j-alliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cn4j-alliance
_______________________________________________