Re: [cn4j-alliance] Finalizing the MP/EE messaging presentation

[Amelia Eiras <aeiras@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

+1 to retain the 2 slides. 

Without then, there is no explanation as to why there are 2 working groups. 

Amelia Eiras 

twitter.com/ameliaeiras

Tribe: http://tomitribe.com     https://tribestream.io  

OSS:  http://microprofile.io     https://jakarta.ee

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 1:03 AM John Clingan <jclingan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I’m not sure if we can come to a consensus on the MP/EE comparison slides. Scott and I have taken two shots at the slide(s). I have withdrawn the slides from the messaging deck in an effort to move forward.

If there is a desire to retain the slides in some form, feel free to comment on this thread.

Thanks.

_______________________________________________
cn4j-alliance mailing list
cn4j-alliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cn4j-alliance