|
On 7/12/2016 11:50 AM, Tyler Jewell
wrote:
<stuff deleted>
Would you like
me to add them to this thread, attempt to set up a slack
channel, or just start a new one with your private email? I
think the guys you should be speaking with are Denis (IBM),
Max / Gorkem (Red Hat), Evgen (Codenvy). and Sven (TypeFox).
Sure, whatever they and you prefer.
Since the
protocol is entirely controlled by Microsoft right now - any
*standards* for how language servers should be implemented
architecturally outside of the specification will need to be
packaged as frameworks. Perhaps even net new Eclipse
projects, for which I think Red Hat, IBM, and Codenvy are
eager to do.
FWIW, this would make for a very concrete way to do this...i.e.
design the LSP services in the open as service interface(s)/types as
part of a multi-participant open project. And it would logically
make sense as separate from any impl. And it could be versioned as
the inevitable protocol changes/enhancements/standardization are
made.
While the
protocol is standardized, we will need more projects that
support the frameworks around creating language servers and
consuming them to make this really stick.
Again FWIW, making it easy to create and consume clients by having
an abstracted set of service APIs in multiple environments can/would
help with that, I would think.
My $0.03.
Scott
|
