| Re: [cdt-dev] indexing results difference between CDT 7.0.x and CDT 8.0 |
Hi, I am still not able to find CDT 8.0 builds from CDT 8.0 M7 to till CDT 8.0 final release, in order to narrow when indexing regression was introduced. I tried downloads page and the following link (http://download.eclipse.org/tools/cdt/builds/8.0.0) but it has only final release. All links sent in the past by Vivian Kong are invalid. I would appreciate your help on this matter. Thanks a lot, Yevgeny From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yevgeny Shifrin Hi Markus, I will try create a simple example. I would prefer to start with narrowing when the indexing regression occurred? For that I need to install CDT 8.0 M7 and other release candidates till CDT 8.0 final release. Unfortunately I am not able to find links to these installations L Thanks, Yevgeny From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schorn, Markus Hi Yevgeny, Using line 75 of your source file, you should be able to construct an example that demonstrates the problem. Could be https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=347462 Markus. From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yevgeny Shifrin Hi, I've seen a case when call hierarchy is working fine from CDT 7.0.2 and not working from CDT 8.0.0. Class B derives from class A. Call Hierarchy for class A constructor, shows Class B constructor in CDT 7.0.2 and not in CDT 8.0.0. I compared between the two Class B parser logs. In CDT 8.0.0 there is the following line ("Unresolved names" section): "Attempt to use symbol failed: A in file B.c++:75". Line 75 is exactly where constructor B calls constructor A. Any idea what that means? Regarding my previous mail: As I mentioned below, CDT 8.0 M7 had indexing statistics similar to CDT 7.0.2. How many milestones there are between CDT 8.0 M7 and CDT 8.0 official release. If there are not many, I could check them and narrow in which milestone this regression was introduced. Is there a link where I could find all CDT 8.0 milestones? Thanks, Yevgeny From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yevgeny Shifrin Hi, Thank you for your reply. Is there a way to produce a full list of unresolved symbols/names? I've seen an option to provide a list of "Unresolved Includes" but it does not help. BTW: As I mentioned below, CDT 8.0 M7 had indexing statistics similar to CDT 7.0.2. How many milestones there are between CDT 8.0 M7 and CDT 8.0 official release. If there are not many, I could check them and narrow in which milestone this regression was introduced. Is there a link where I could find all CDT 8.0 milestones? Thanks, Yevgeny From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sergey Prigogin Try to find examples of unresolved symbols and syntax errors that were not present in CDT 7.0.2, and then try to find patterns in them. Ideally you should be able to produce small reproducible examples and create bugs based on them. -sergey On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Yevgeny Shifrin <Yevgeny.Shifrin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hello, I am working on big C++ code base. I see difference in indexing results between CDT 7.0.x and CDT 8.0 on exactly the same project with the same configurations. CDT 7.0.2: Indexed 'proj1' (several dozen K of sources and headers) in 2,602.16 sec: ~2M declarations; ~11M+17544 references; ~1K unresolved inclusions; ~1K syntax errors; ~80K unresolved names CDT 8.0.0: Indexed 'proj1' (several dozen K of sources and headers) in 3,428.65 sec: ~2M+35 declarations; ~11M references; ~1K unresolved inclusions; ~1K+25 syntax errors; ~200K unresolved names I would like to understand the root cause for this difference. Is there a regression in CDT 8.0 behavior, or other reason? In CDT 8.0 M7 the statistics were similar to CDT 7.0.2. Is it possible that between CDT 8.0 M7 and CDT 8.0 release, change was submitted that causes this regression. From indexing functionality point of view (in the last month) I did not see regression in CDT 8.0 in compare to CDT 7.0.2. At least in one case CDT 8.0 was "smarter" than CDT 7.0.2. I would appreciate any comments suggestion on this issue. Thanks, Yevgeny This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof.
This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof. This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof. This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof. This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof. |