RE: [cdt-dev] Managed Build Kick-off Meeting Details

[Sean Evoy <sevoy@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Doug,
And sorry all. It looks like a bunch
of my emails last Thursday afternoon bounced and I was away for a long
weekend so I missed this one. As Doug stated, we have reached a point where
it would be useful for everyone working on (or using) the CDT to sit down
and discuss the architecture of the managed build system. I had a very
ambitious agenda in mind when I scheduled the meeting a couple of weeks
ago, but the more I thought about what we could accomplish in a first meeting,
the more I realized that this would likely be too rigid. So, while it is
a bit late now, here is a synopsis of the mail that did not go out last
week suggested the following:

Proposed Agenda: (all times EDT)
10:30 - 10:40 Meet and greet
10:40 - 11:40 Discuss Leo's proposed
enhancements and the feedback it has received (this gives partners a chance
to discuss their own requirements)
11:40 - 12:15 Discuss how the target
model proposed by MontaVista fits into the architecture
12:15 - 12:30 Wrap up by scheduling
follow-up meetings depending on what areas we did not reach consensus on


Sean Evoy
Rational Software - IBM Software Group
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Douglas Schaefer/Ottawa/IBM@IBMCA
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/26/2004 03:10 PM

Please respond to
cdt-dev

To	cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	RE: [cdt-dev] Managed Build Kick-off Meeting Details

Essentially, what I'd like to see discussed is any
open issues with 
Intel's proposal for Managed Build, 
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=68232. Does it or can it
be 
tweaked to meet everyone's needs, both enterprise and embedded/cross 
development? How does it play with the other proposals out there like 
MontaVista's target model, 
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=65471. Does it solve 
everyone's issues with the current managed build?

If we can reach consensus that this is the direction we want to go, then
we should start putting together an action plan for getting this proposal
implemented. If we can't reach consensus, then we should at least put a
plan together where we continue studying the blockers and work towards
coming up with alternatives.

How does that sound with everyone?

Doug Schaefer, IBM's Eclipse CDT Architect
Ottawa (Palladium), Ontario, Canada



"Brad Jarvinen" <Brad.Jarvinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
07/26/2004 02:02 PM
Please respond to
cdt-dev


To
<cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
RE: [cdt-dev] Managed Build Kick-off Meeting Details






Is there an agenda for this meeting?  It'd be nice to know what issues
to 
bring to the table.

Thanks,
Brad
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]On 
Behalf Of Sean Evoy
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 8:19 AM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cdt-dev] Managed Build Kick-off Meeting Details


Hi All, 
As I said last week, the first meeting of the managed build working group
will take place at 10:30 EDT on Tuesday, July 27. 

Just to let everyone know how to dial in: 
Local dial-in number:              
         613-787-5018
Toll-free Dial-in number:              
         1 866-842-3549 

According to our conferencing service, that's all you have to do. I can
host up to 20 lines so it would be great if, at sites where there is more
than 1 participant, you could use 1 line. 

Sean Evoy
Rational Software - IBM Software Group
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev